An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use a limited company that hasn't been trading to apply for a Restricted PSV licence even though it was formed a year ago. He has another limited company that he uses for a different business and he was told to use that company instead. But he would prefer to use the first one. I've never heard anything like that. Does that make any sense and have you seen anything like that in written guidance? Thanks.
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
Has one of the directors had issues?
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
Could be the nature of LTD company business
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
how can a limited company that does passenger transport claim that the o license is not for the full time job? It should be a standard license, surely?
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
if it doesn’t trade, then how can the mini bus be a secondary occupation. The exact reason it’s been declined.Ovidiumi wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 3:24 pmThe company did not trade, as follows from the question, but intended to start.
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
If that take away company did not trade, it could have in the future plans to start trading, with secondary occupation.
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
According to this guide https://www.siccode.co.uk/sic2007/code-49390 there can be so many different types of businesses which are not necessarily pcv, and won't require a pcv o license. I do not argue with you or say that your logic is wrong but can you imagine a situation when I do not trade and I plan to open a network of take away food places and I plan to have a restricted o license to take people to work there? Even I do not trade I do not feel like there is something wrong in planning these activities to happen. In this case, it would be unfair to refuse a restricted license application. However, if the untrading company is pcv you are 100% right.Paullace wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 3:25 pmif any company doesn’t trade then applied for a restricted license, by default the psv activities would be the main occupation.
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
so start the takeaways then apply for the license. It sounds like your a while from needing it yet anyway as the core business hasn’t started trading.Ovidiumi wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 3:27 pmAccording to this guide https://www.siccode.co.uk/sic2007/code-49390 there can be so many different types of businesses which are not necessarily pcv, and won't require a pcv o license. I do not argue with you or say that your logic is wrong but can you imagine a situation when I do not trade and I plan to open a network of take away food places and I plan to have a restricted o license to take people to work there? Even I do not trade I do not feel like there is something wrong in planning these activities to happen. In this case, it would be unfair to refuse a restricted license application. However, if the untrading company is pcv you are 100% right.
But on the other hand if it’s just to transport staff then surely no license is needed anyway as it’s not for hire or reward…
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
Not my business but I find the question interesting.Paullace wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 3:27 pmso start the takeaways then apply for the license. It sounds like your a while from needing it yet anyway as the core business hasn’t started trading.Ovidiumi wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 3:27 pmAccording to this guide https://www.siccode.co.uk/sic2007/code-49390 there can be so many different types of businesses which are not necessarily pcv, and won't require a pcv o license. I do not argue with you or say that your logic is wrong but can you imagine a situation when I do not trade and I plan to open a network of take away food places and I plan to have a restricted o license to take people to work there? Even I do not trade I do not feel like there is something wrong in planning these activities to happen. In this case, it would be unfair to refuse a restricted license application. However, if the untrading company is pcv you are 100% right.
But on the other hand if it’s just to transport staff then surely no license is needed anyway as it’s not for hire or reward…
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
wouldn't of thought that would be granted, very difficult to get a restricted PCV now due to the amount of fraudulent activities and misuse
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
A restricted licence is only available to be a lesser part of a business - if the first company has not traded then operating the vehicle(s) would automatically become the primary business. It does not help that the classification would seem to have been selected to reflect that intention.
It is based on THE business not the director
It is based on THE business not the director
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
Can't be main job!
Apply in the other companies name and declare that the operation of a bus will not be their main source of income and will be lower than turn over of main company.
Apply in the other companies name and declare that the operation of a bus will not be their main source of income and will be lower than turn over of main company.
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
The restricted O licence is intended for a manufacturer to deliver their own goods, or for example a scaffolder to carry their equipment, by separating the transport into a separate company, it becomes a general haulage contractor to the other company.
Re: An operator applying for a Restricted PSV operator's licence has been told by a caseworker that he can't use
that’s hgv. This is psv. It’s intended for someone to operate 2 16 seaters as a part time job.
just on a weekend, for example.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests