Is this correct? the TC requires the maintenance providers address on the PMIs. But this is a new one on me.

[daaspa]

I have just been informed, that apparently, the TC requires the maintenance providers address on the PMIs.
Is this correct?
My company provides software and a number of maintenance companies are using it. I've obviously seen forms from like RHA, FTA etc, but this is a new one on me.

[Pausale]

A common failing on PMI sheets is that workshops seldom add their name and address unless using their own printed stationary.

[alfredo]

I insist on it, even if it’s only their company stamp

[daaspa]

I insist on it, even if it’s only their company stamp

where the company have provided a logo (and the maintenance company in question has done so), the logo is on the document.

[pilladax]

If the provider is using bespoke pre-printed forms that have their name, and address on that is acceptable. Electronic systems such as R2C require the Maint provider to input their details.
One thing I find when auditing is the Maint provider doesn’t use the full company name and entity when completing inspection sheets. I.e. Joe Bloggs Haulage Ltd is just written or typed J Bloggs or any combination but seldom the full legal name and entity

[Astonry]

Yes

[Mulleco]

The digital maintenance sheets we use now have our garage name and address on them but the techpro books we used to use didn’t have an option for a address.

[Indmann]

I’ve just been advising an operator with “problems” and this issue was raised as a concern during a site visit

[Dawsma]

I insist on Provider name, address, the inspectors printed name, signed & their postcode, as well as place of inspection.

[Bryeber]

Yes, it should be printed on the inspection sheet. Usually a rubber stamp at the top in the details section.